Loading
What happened on the moon 1 of 3
Share
Favourite
Report
to Channel
Added September 25, 2009Video Info
| By: | fry |
| Category: | Educational |
| Length: | 65:56 |
| Resolution: | 576 x 384 |
| Filesize: | 377 MB |
| Language: | English |
| Viewed: | 8776 times |
This film throws into doubt the authenticity
of the Apollo mission media and gives
information that
...This film throws into doubt the authenticity
of the Apollo mission media and gives
information that challenges the declared
abilities of NASA to successfully send a man
to the Moon and return him safely to Earth
New evidence suggests that NASA hoaxed or
Doctored pictures allegedly taken on the
lunar surface. These findings are supported
by analysis and the testimony of experts from
various disciplines, including photographer /
filmmaker David S. Percy ARPS and physicist
David Groves PhD. Hear what NASA has to say
in response to these disturbing findings
Report
If this video has any content that goes against our terms and condition, for example, has explicit adult content, please enter the reason and we will review it shortly.
Please note that if you would like a video removed on copyright grounds, you must provide proof that you are a representative of the copyright holder. In this case, it may be easier to contact us directly.
Pages: Newest 1 2 3 Oldest
Absolutely. And some of the most glaring examples of Apollo forgery are the videos shot of the lunar module or its ascent stage while in orbit around the moon. See http://apolloanomalies.com/mech_attitude_changes.htm. The cake gets taken by one video in particular that shows the lunar module ascent stage slowly approaching the command module and suddenly, the camera gets bumped just enough for the video's background to shift slightly. The problem is that not everything in the background shifts in unison (see http://apolloanomalies.com/media/m0003.wmv). Look closely and You'll see unmistakably that the LM shifts out-of-sync with the lunar surface behind it. So, how do you explain this, Scfi? When was the last time you saw a video camera pan and the background of the video >>didn't<< shift perfectly in unison with the foreground as a result? That's right, the video can only be a fake!
Ok, and how exactly could I access these reflectors in a way that would prove beyond all doubt that they are in fact on the moon's surface, and that they were left there by men who actually walked on the surface of the moon?
Gee, I didn't even have to try and I was somehow able to avoid hearing virtually everything the East Germans said back then. (LOL) So what you're saying is that had the Russians, East Germans, etc. stated that the moon non-landings were a fraud perpetrated on the American people then, by some incredible miracle, you would've >>necessarily<< heard about this... in the U.S.! Wow, that's impressive stuff scfi! Can you make large statues disappear too? I can assure you that most Americans back then >>weren't<< hanging on every word that was published in Pravda.
You haven't the faintest idea.
There once was a place called Deutsche Demokratische Republik. You couldn't avoid them back then even if you tried. They would have told you.
Even they weren't that thick.
Even the British would have deep-fired Nixon & Company given half a chance (Hyper left wing gouvernment at the time ...). Back then, no one liked the US of A. Any mistake was exploited. There was no mistake in this.
Laser reflectors - you could, if you stopped theorising and tried some science for a sec or two.
By the way, keep the bag over your had, by all means, at all times. It suits your oppinions. Seen my sign ? That's HAL from 2001. Of course any image could be faked back then. Look at the whole picture and people's mistakes, then you see the some thruth.
Pages: Newest 1 2 3 Oldest