Loading
911 Mysteries: Demolitions
Share
Favourite
Report
to ChannelTags
Added March 8, 2009Video Info
| By: | gamer11515 |
| Category: | Films and Movies |
| Length: | 90:46 |
| Resolution: | 448 x 336 |
| Filesize: | 514 MB |
| Language: | English |
| Viewed: | 6005 times |
Tall buildings shatter in 10 seconds; steel beams buckle as if crushed by Superman; a volcano of ash
...Tall buildings shatter in 10 seconds; steel beams buckle as if crushed by Superman; a volcano of ash darkens the sky. Can jet fuel perform such a feat?
911 Mysteries is a careful deconstruction of the official story set alongside clean, clear science. It is ninety-minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with eye opening witness testimonials.
The 9/11 picture is not one of politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics: How do you get a 10-second,110-story pancake collapse of a major structure?
This is the film that might actually reach out to mainstream America-no agenda, no finger-pointing-just the facts and "mysteries." It is a story of people. Willie Rodriguez's recollection of strange noises on the 34th floor, and Scott Forbes' similar story. Who was up there bumping around just weeks before the towers fell?
This is also the story of blasting itself; how shaped charges are strategically placed to slice through steel beams, allowing total control of how a building falls. This information helps give a better understanding of how a building can be purposely set to collapse and shed insight into what happened on the fateful day of 9/11.
Report
If this video has any content that goes against our terms and condition, for example, has explicit adult content, please enter the reason and we will review it shortly.
Please note that if you would like a video removed on copyright grounds, you must provide proof that you are a representative of the copyright holder. In this case, it may be easier to contact us directly.
Comments
What do you think of this video? Leave a comment. |
dixiedragon wrote 8 months ago: Nothing here is surprising or even shock
Rating: 0
Show
Nothing here is surprising or even shocking. It is well within the realm of possible for our government/administration to have orchestrated this. Joebobe and others have stated it's "impossible to rig a column for a cutting charge without it being visible." and talk about the time and sheer numbers required to pull this off -- I disagree and I am not a "troofer" or conspiracy theorist - just an average woman from GA - but I DO believe we DO NOT know what kinds of explosives, weapons, technology our government has developed secretly. Do we REALLY believe that we can be trilliions of bucks in debt and it's all gone to overpriced hammers and toilet seats? How stupid of us. There are slush funds for the slush funds and this has been a long long time in the planning - we were tested at Ruby Ridge and Waco to see just how far we can be pushed - the 2004 bombing, Oklahoma City, I can easily see a pattern in the testing of our human frailty as sheeple leading to the Homeland Security Act
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:  
Rating: 0
|
 |
ChristallC wrote 9 months ago: ZEITGEIST
Rating: 0
Show
ZEITGEIST
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: 0
|
 |
joebobe wrote 1 year ago: It is impossible to rig a column for a c
Rating: -1
Show
It is impossible to rig a column for a cutting charge without it being visible. That and the sheer number of columns renders any demolition theory moot. There were around 288 columns in the each WTC building. Rigging one floor would take 100 people a week to do, with all sheet rock opened up at every column, each column would have to have holes cut to allow mounting of the cutter charges, and the associated wiring, det cord, and delay timer segments would look like a spaghetti jungle inside each floor. Every picture of the exterior of the WTC impeaches the silly argument that explosives were used. Try to grow up and find something positive to be a fanatic about, because Trooferism just rots your brain.
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: -1
|
|
joebobe wrote 1 year ago: Oh my, what a gem. Brad is a demolition
Rating: -1
Show
Oh my, what a gem. Brad is a demolition "hobbyist", which means what? He is as ignorant as the rest of the Troofer movement. When you talk to one of these creeps and ask specific questions, they fold like a tent and say "we're just asking questions". No, you make accusations that have already been debunked a thousand times. Not one has ever had a coherent answer to a simple question: Where, exactly, were the explosives?
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: -1
|
 |
turner69 wrote 1 year ago: perhaps waterboarding your x president m
Rating: +1
Show
perhaps waterboarding your x president might shine a light on 911. god bless all the victims and their families.
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: +1
|
 |
RAB78 wrote 1 year ago: It's sad that 911 truthers are seen as d
Rating: 0
Show
It's sad that 911 truthers are seen as disrespectful, when in fact the truth movement was started by the families of the lost that just wanted answers.
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: 0
|
 |
Adam-Astor wrote 2 years ago: Wake tha fuck up,yankees!!
Rating: +1
Show
Wake tha fuck up,yankees!!
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: +1
|
 |
earthkeyper wrote 2 years ago: It takes a small mind not to look beyond
Rating: +2
Show
It takes a small mind not to look beyond a mass programming of the public to believe that the planes took down the towers. The evidence is out there! They have found the cutter charge (Thermite) used in demolition at the site. I am surprised of the amount of people who do not even know that there was a third building that collapsed, building # 7. Which wasn't even touched by the planes, but fires mysteriously developed. A great amount of engineers believe now that the towers were an act of demolition. Also the buildings had been sited for Asbestos removal a multi billion dollar operation. This film may not be the best out there, but it does present the truth. In my mind there is no question that theses structures were demolished by explosives. The question is, who did it?
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: +2
|
 |
simontalks wrote 2 years ago: Small minds, tiny heads, no science. Typ
Rating: -2
Show
Small minds, tiny heads, no science. Typical intellectually damaged conspiracy theory put forth by left-thinking idealogues. "Conservative-Republican" - An attempt to establish credibility where there is none. What ever the writer calls himself is relevant only to his motivations and changes nothing about facts. He is a conspiracy theorist. Mel Gibson character without the rational thinking. Enough said.
|
|
Is this comment offensive or spam? Report it
Rate:
Rating: -2
|
